comex wrote:
On 12/20/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As stated above, I find that all of these points conflict with the
best interests of the game, and so I think it important to deviate
from the set interpretation. In contrast, a rational number
interpretation results in no such pro
On 12/20/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As stated above, I find that all of these points conflict with the
> best interests of the game, and so I think it important to deviate
> from the set interpretation. In contrast, a rational number
> interpretation results in no such problems. B
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:
> Finally, Rule 2156 defines circumstances under which VVLOP is
> specifically set to an integer value. Each week, EVLOP is explicitly
> "rounded to an integer", making it clearly an integer, and VVLOP is
> then "set to the same rounded value", not to an equ
3 matches
Mail list logo
