On Dec 25, 2007, at 9:54 AM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007, at 3:57 PM, Zefram wrote:
I hereby assign the judicial panel of Iammars, OscarMeyr, and root as
judge of CFJ 1831b.
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1831b
With the agreement of my fellow H. Appeal
On Jan 1, 2008 11:28 AM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you say concurring opinion, do you want an opinion on the original
> statement or an opinion on why it should be appealed?
Rule 911 defines the term:
A panel CAN publish a concurring opinion when judging AFFIRM,
and SHA
When you say concurring opinion, do you want an opinion on the original
statement or an opinion on why it should be appealed?
On Dec 25, 2007 7:54 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the agreement of my fellow H. Appeal Panelists Iammars and root,
> I intend to have the panel AF
On Dec 25, 2007 7:54 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the agreement of my fellow H. Appeal Panelists Iammars and root,
> I intend to have the panel AFFIRM H. Judge G. Eris's ruling of FALSE,
> on the strength of Goethe's appeal argument in 1831a asking for the
> original reman
4 matches
Mail list logo
