Benjamin Schultz wrote:
>A player is ineligible to judge CFJs while e is in the chokey.
The term is "unqualified to be assigned as judge of a judicial case".
I also suggest that you add it to rule 1868, which governs assignment
of judges.
-zefram
On 9/21/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 21, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Taral wrote:
> >
> >
> > (People in the chokey really shouldn't be able to judge cases.)
> >
> > Proto (AI=2):
> >
> > Amend R1504 by appending to the para
On 9/21/07, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Taral wrote:
>
>
> (People in the chokey really shouldn't be able to judge cases.)
>
> Proto (AI=2):
>
> Amend R1504 by appending to the paragraph starting "CHOKEY", the following
> sentence:
>
> A player is in
On Sep 21, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Taral wrote:
(People in the chokey really shouldn't be able to judge cases.)
Proto (AI=2):
Amend R1504 by appending to the paragraph starting "CHOKEY", the
following sentence:
A player is ineligible to judge CFJs while e is in the chokey.
-
Benjamin Schul
Roger Hicks wrote:
>I intend, with 2 SUPPORT to appeal this CFJ.
You can't appeal the CFJ as a whole. You can appeal the verdict, and
you can appeal the sentence. These are independent: you can appeal
either or both.
And you don't need any support.
-zefram
On 9/21/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/6/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Action: failing to notify the defendant in CFJ 1735 as soon as possible
> > > while assigned as judge of that case during the pre-trial pe
6 matches
Mail list logo
