Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1729: assign root

2007-08-28 Thread Roger Hicks
On 8/28/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/28/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I submit the following proposal: > > > > Make Bob's messages valid > > AI: 3 > > { > > Flip the publicity of agora-discussion@agoranomic.org to "Public" > > } > > This defeats the purpose of th

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1729: assign root

2007-08-28 Thread Ian Kelly
On 8/28/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I submit the following proposal: > > Make Bob's messages valid > AI: 3 > { > Flip the publicity of agora-discussion@agoranomic.org to "Public" > } This defeats the purpose of the discussion forum. We might just as well strip the DF of its forum

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1729: assign root

2007-08-28 Thread Zefram
Roger Hicks wrote: >I object, NTTPF. > not that it has any meaning... It doesn't in the DF, certainly. -zefram

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 1729: assign root

2007-08-28 Thread Roger Hicks
On 8/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal root's judgement of CFJ 1729. > I object, not that it has any meaning... BobTHJ