omd wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> No they aren't, the report is "as of the last PSM's report" which
>> pre-dated omd's attempts.
>
> E's still required to publish an up-to-date list of Allegiances, just
> not Fan holdings.
Well, the message is still correct, it ju
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> No they aren't, the report is "as of the last PSM's report" which
> pre-dated omd's attempts.
E's still required to publish an up-to-date list of Allegiances, just
not Fan holdings.
coppro wrote:
> On 10/03/2010 06:44 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> [Note, this report is a week (almost two weeks) out of date due to the
>> lack of a recent PSM's report, and thus is basically useless. I doubt I
>> have time to figure out what the PSM's report should have said before
>> the end of the
3 matches
Mail list logo
