To: Agora Discussion
Cc: Jason Cobb
Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8308-8321
On 2/7/20 1:35 AM, Luke Tyler via agora-business wrote:
>> 8308& Falsifian3.0 Imposing order on the order
> PRESENT
>
>> 8309* Alexis
On 2/7/20 1:35 AM, Luke Tyler via agora-business wrote:
>> 8308& Falsifian3.0 Imposing order on the order
> PRESENT
>
>> 8309* Alexis 3.0 A Degree of Inefficiency
> AGAINST
>
I'm sorry, I believe you missed the cutoff by a few hours.
--
Jason Cobb
On 2/1/20 5:33 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
>> 8310& Jason, Alexis3.0 Deputisation timeliness
> PRESENT. Seems inoffensive, but I haven't been paying attention to the
> discussion about why it's necessary. Also it's one of those proposals
> that requires me to pain
On 2/1/20 5:24 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> 8310& Jason, Alexis3.0 Deputisation timeliness
> AGAIST --- Wouldn't let me deputise for a vacant office to perform an
> action unrelated to the office?
Err... yes, yes it would. That's not good. (No, this wasn't a scam.)
-
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 03:15, omd via agora-business
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:29 PM Aris Merchant via agora-official
> wrote:
> > 8308& Falsifian3.0 Imposing order on the order
> AGAINST; I think this is too vague to be a valid rule change
Are you referring to this pa
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 22:15, omd via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > 8316* Alexis 3.0 Zombie voting package
> PRESENT; the fact that the new Rule 683 clause forces default votes to
> be "valid" means that they could be submitted even by ineligible
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
