On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
> ATMunn wrote:
>
> > > 8131 天火狐, twg 2.0 V.J. Rada Protection Act
> > PRESENT, what's this about?
>
> As I understand it, V.J. Rada returned to the game in the middle of
> being auctioned as a zombie, and was/is currently unable to stop th
ATMunn wrote:
8131 天火狐, twg 2.0 V.J. Rada Protection Act
PRESENT, what's this about?
As I understand it, V.J. Rada returned to the game in the middle of
being auctioned as a zombie, and was/is currently unable to stop the
auction from finishing and the winner from pilfering eir as
Ah, I see. Never mind, then.
On 11/11/2018 09:17 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
No, it's where you said "Amend Rule 2555 'Blots' by replacing the
paragraph beginning 'To Lefy a Fine' with:". So it doesn't appear in
the amended text. Furthermore, Rule 105 says that an inconsequential
misquotation in an
No, it's where you said "Amend Rule 2555 'Blots' by replacing the
paragraph beginning 'To Lefy a Fine' with:". So it doesn't appear in
the amended text. Furthermore, Rule 105 says that an inconsequential
misquotation in an amendment is ignored, so the proposal still works.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 11, 20
On 11/11/2018 08:52 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs
FOR. Trigon, this is one of the most beautiful changes I've seen since
I became a player. I'm not sure why I find it so elegant, but I do.
There's a typo ("lefy" instead of "levy"), but it's Rule
5 matches
Mail list logo
