Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6842-6846

2010-09-23 Thread Taral
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:15 PM, omd wrote: > Too late. Even with the extended deadline? -- Taral "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."     -- Unknown

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6842-6846

2010-09-23 Thread omd
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Taral wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Warrigal wrote: >>       AI   II Proposer Date        Num   Title >>       2.0  1  omd      2010-09-07  6842  Capa > AGAINST Too late.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6842-6846

2010-09-15 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > FOR all of these. (but my voting limit is 0 anyway?) I believe this batch was all made Democratic, so your voting limit is 1.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6842-6846

2010-09-13 Thread Keba
omd wrote: > If the initial NoV was invalid and if this is possible, I pay a fee to > publish a NoV identical to the above, contest it, and initiate a > criminal case on it. Fails, you do not possess any ergs. -- PSM Keba

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6842-6846

2010-09-13 Thread Ed Murphy
omd wrote: > If the initial NoV was invalid and if this is possible, I pay a fee to > publish a NoV identical to the above, contest it, and initiate a > criminal case on it. This would be your third NoV in the same week, so a 1-erg fee per Rule 2230. H. PSM Keba, did omd have at least 1 erg at t

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6842-6846

2010-09-13 Thread omd
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Warrigal wrote: > I contest this. Isn't it possible to question an obvious truth? Don't > philosophers do it all the time? There's great precedent for the law punishing philosophers. ;)

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6842-6846

2010-09-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Warrigal wrote: > > Also, I question whether violating a SHALL is a rule violation if > > GUILTY is inappropriate. > > I publish an NoV alleging that H. Pariah Tanner L. Swett violated the > Power-1 Rule 2215 by maki

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6842-6846

2010-09-13 Thread Warrigal
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Warrigal wrote: >> Also, I question whether violating a SHALL is a rule violation if >> GUILTY is inappropriate. > > Can you elaborate on what you mean by this? I momentarily forgot the text of "Mother, May I?". —Pariah

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6842-6846

2010-09-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Warrigal wrote: > Also, I question whether violating a SHALL is a rule violation if > GUILTY is inappropriate. Can you elaborate on what you mean by this?