Sgeo wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Sgeo wrote:
>>
> 6351 D 2 2.0 C-walker
>
AGAINST (Please also secure ceasing to be a Senator if you're going to
secure becoming a Senator.)
>>> I change my vote on 6351 to AGAINST, for the same reason
c-walker wrote:
> 6346 O 2 1.0 coppro Ribbon oops
>
> ENDORSE... a trustworthy player
>
>
> If this was a valid vote, I retract it, and vote AGAINST instead.
It wasn't, so you don't.
Sgeo wrote:
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
>>> FOR, unless there's reason to believe that this can hurt Agora.
> I change this vote to FOR.
Ineffective, you can't directly change a vote.
2009/6/10 Charles Walker :
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>>>
>>> 6346 O 2 1.0 coppro Ribbon oops
>>
>> ENDORSE... a trustworthy player
>
> If this was a valid vote, I retract it, and vote AGAINST instead.
>
If it was not a valid vote, does this read to simp
>> 6351 D 2 2.0 C-walker
> Endorse Sgeo, or PRESENT if e doesn't vote on this
That happens automatically now.
Wooble wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Sgeo wrote:
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
>>> FOR, unless there's reason to believe that this can hurt Agora.
>
> H. Assessor: please evaluate this as a conditional vote evaluating to no vote
> :P
Done, on the grounds of insuff
Sgeo wrote:
>> AGAINST -- It's probably my imagination, but I think that could be
>> interpreted to mean that once those conditions come about, anyone can
>> destroy any rests..
If so, the bug is in the current Ruleset (but harder to exploit).
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Sgeo wrote:
>>> 6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
>> FOR, unless there's reason to believe that this can hurt Agora.
H. Assessor: please evaluate this as a conditional vote evaluating to no vote :P
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> The rule uses SHOULD not SHALL. Officers are only encouraged to use
> the official nickname, not required to do so.
Nice. Punishment for no purpose. Now *that's* treating Agora right
good forever.
I shall choose no official nickname whatsoever, refer to
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:07, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:26, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote:
> 6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll start insisting on m
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:26, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> I vote:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
>>> AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll start insisting on my full
>>> nickname before it passes. I shall also insis
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:26, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I vote:
>>> 6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
>> AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll start insisting on my full
>> nickname before it passes. I shall also insist on the long version after
>> it passes and vi
I vote as follows:
6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
PRESENT
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
FOR
6346 O 2 1.0 coppro Ribbon oops
FOR
6347 O 0 1.0 coppro Ribbon cleanup
FOR
6348 O 1 1.0 coppro B Friends
FOR
6349 D 1 2.0 Pavitra
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I vote:
>> 6344 O 1 1.0 BobTHJ Nicked Off
> AGAINST. If this comes close to passing I'll start insisting on my full
> nickname before it passes. I shall also insist on the long version after
> it passes and violate the rule in civil protest. If you choose to blo
14 matches
Mail list logo
