Oh boy, I get to figure out ratification!
Gaelan
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 7:05 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
>
> G. wrote:
>
>> GUESS WHAT: It's worse than that. There *is* no Referee's weekly report!
>> There's no place I can find that puts together "referee" and "Report".
>
> How long has that be
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
>
> > Sigh. I deputize for the REFEREE to resolve the finger-pointing as
> > indicated
> > below.
>
> Leaving this out of the ADoP history, as you already were Referee
> (unless I missed something else).
The subsequent conversation was tha
G. wrote:
Sigh. I deputize for the REFEREE to resolve the finger-pointing as indicated
below.
Leaving this out of the ADoP history, as you already were Referee
(unless I missed something else).
G. wrote:
GUESS WHAT: It's worse than that. There *is* no Referee's weekly report!
There's no place I can find that puts together "referee" and "Report".
How long has that been the case, so I can remove relevant bits from the
ADoP database?
Ah, I forgot that asset clause, and that pledges are assets. We're all
good then, you're right. My deputization for finger-pointing should
be good, I think that's the only official duty I tried to do when we
thought I was Referee (other than a now-owed report).
The clause you're seeking is in
There is the following provision "The recordkeepor of a class of
assets is the entity (if any)
defined as such by, and bound by, its backing document. That
entity's report includes a list of all instances of that class and
their owners."
I'm 95% sure there was at one point a rule that said "if any
>I deputize for the Registrar
You'll have to do this again.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> GUESS WHAT: It's worse than that. There *is* no Referee's weekly report!
> There's no place I can find that puts together "referee" and "Report".
>
> While the rules say the Re
Just checked it and yes, you're right. By a few hours, it was in the 28th.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Genuine correction: By UTC, I think my Pink Slip hit on Feb 28 not
> March 1? Matters for payday.
>
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Sorry, I was just
Ah OK
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, I was just catching the lack of that stuff in the top line
> ("recent events") which doesn't ratify. Was puzzled by the line
> between "previous report" and "last report" not sure the difference
> there? No biggie just the f
Genuine correction: By UTC, I think my Pink Slip hit on Feb 28 not
March 1? Matters for payday.
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Sorry, I was just catching the lack of that stuff in the top line
> ("recent events") which doesn't ratify. Was puzzled by the line
> between "previous rep
I don't get that first part.
The "spoiling fun" cards are there, the red one I got and then the counter
card you got (gmail screwed with the formatting somehow, first time I do
this... But aside from awkward spacing, its there:):
> 8 Feb 2017 Cuddlebeam is issued a Red Card by Summary Judgement f
Sorry, I was just catching the lack of that stuff in the top line
("recent events") which doesn't ratify. Was puzzled by the line
between "previous report" and "last report" not sure the difference
there? No biggie just the format fooled me.
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Coe: missin
12 matches
Mail list logo
