G. wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011, omd wrote:
>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Since an "action statement" states that the performer is performing
>> the action, "This may be ineffective." is equivalent to "This
>> statement might be false." The precedent of 2
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:49 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> The two key sections of the disclaimer in CFJ 1971 are
I, umm, think I got a bit too carried away writing that disclaimer, and
I'm not sure if it makes for a very good precedent as a result. (I think
it contradicts itself several times, as well
omd wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> == CFJ 3000 ==
>>
>>In general, if a purported action by announcement is accompanied
>>by a disclaimer equivalent to "this may be ineffective", without
>>indicat
On Fri, 20 May 2011, omd wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I think the 2069 precedent is irrelevant here (as Judge Tanner L. Swett says
> > in 2830).
>
> I disagree; even though 2069 was FALSE because an announcement is an
> action, ais523 made a stronger argument
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I think the 2069 precedent is irrelevant here (as Judge Tanner L. Swett says
> in 2830).
I disagree; even though 2069 was FALSE because an announcement is an
action, ais523 made a stronger argument in eir reasoning.
> I think your 3000 judgem
On Fri, 20 May 2011, omd wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> > > Since an "action statement" states that the performer is performing
> >> > > the action, "This may be ineffective." is equivalent to "This
> >> > > statement might be false." The precedent of 2069 et
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > > Since an "action statement" states that the performer is performing
>> > > the action, "This may be ineffective." is equivalent to "This
>> > > statement might be false." The precedent of 2069 etc. is that some
>> > > actions, including
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > > In general, if a purported action by announcement is accompanied
> > > > by a disclaimer equivalent to "this may be ineffective", without
> > > > indicating why it may be ineffective, then the action is
> > > > ineffective due to ambigu
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011, omd wrote:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > > == CFJ 3000 ==
> > >
> > > In general, if a purported action by announcement is accompanied
> > >
On Fri, 20 May 2011, omd wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > == CFJ 3000 ==
> >
> > In general, if a purported action by announcement is accompanied
> > by a disclaimer equivalent to "this may be ineffect
10 matches
Mail list logo
