Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 affirmed by allispaul, Taral, Tiger

2009-06-17 Thread Sean Hunt
Roger Hicks wrote: > Fails. No new rests were created as a result of appeal. You can only > destroy rests from the prior judgement if the appeal overrules, > remands, or reassigns. > > BobTHJ Ah, yes, I was confusing it with the closed NoV -> GUILTY interaction that causes double rests.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 affirmed by allispaul, Taral, Tiger

2009-06-17 Thread Roger Hicks
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:12, Sean Hunt wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2545a >> >>  Appeal 2545a   >> >> Panelist:                               Tiger >> Decision: