On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> "[T]he ratified document was completely true and accurate _at the time
> it was published_."
"The gamestate is modified so that". Effects are limited to modifying
the gamestate in some way.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Due to the report's ratification, our current gamestate takes that
> report to have been accurate, so the act cannot have been illegal.
"Nevertheless, the ratification of a
public document does not invalidate, reverse, alter, or cancel
Rule 1551/12 (Power=3)
Ratification
A public document is part (possibly all) of a public message.
When a public document is ratified, the gamestate is modified so
that the ratified document was completely true and accurate at
the time it was published. Nevertheless, the r
Gratuitous: this CFJ asks about the past gamestate, not a current
gamestate which may or may not contain ratified elements.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 22, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Ed Murphy
wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcas
4 matches
Mail list logo
