On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Arguments:
>>
>> Judgement (of ALREADY TRIED) has already been reached in another
>> criminal case (this one) with the same defendant, the same rule, and
>> the same alleged act. Therefore the only appropriate judgement for
>> CFJ 2273 is ALREADY TRIED.
>
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But the judgment of 2273 was appropriate at the time it was made. The
> fact that it would now be inappropriate does not change the fact that
> the judgment was appropriate at the time, and is therefore correct.
Yeah, I noticed th
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:58 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> * ALREADY TRIED, appropriate if judgement has already been
>>reached in another criminal case with the same defendant, the
>>same rule, an
comex wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * ALREADY TRIED, appropriate if judgement has already been
>>reached in another criminal case with the same defendant, the
>>same rule, and substantially the same alleged act
>>
>> Sounds about
4 matches
Mail list logo
