ais523 wrote:
> I'm not convinced that that's an appropriate alternative judgement, and
> I don't want to break the rules, so I won't support this. However, you
> can still get it through with the CotC's support...
Oh, you're /funny/.
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 13:21 -0700, Ian Kelly wrote:
> My objection isn't over whether or not it's reasonable, but to the
> total lack arguments.
Actually, I think the appropriate judgement here is AFFIRM but with
different arguments to the original judge. I don't have arguments handy
yet, though, w
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinu
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2248a
>>>
>>> Appea
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 12:55 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:48, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2248a
> >>
> >> ==
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2248a
>>
>> Appeal 2248a
>
> I
6 matches
Mail list logo
