On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "I wish to register as a player" seems pretty explicit to me.
The fact that all registering does is flip an entity switch, and we
have nothing like B Nomic's "A Player is an Outsider who consents to
be governed by the rules[...
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ivan Hope wrote:
>> Implicit consent is not explicit consent. I judge the same thing as
>> before, which is TRUE.
>
> Rule 1742 does not require explicit consent. I intend (with 2 support)
> to appeal this case, and I recommen
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 2 June 2008 10:05:23 Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Ivan Hope wrote:
>>
>> > Implicit consent is not explicit consent. I judge the same thing as
>> > before, which is TRUE.
>>
>> Rule 1742 does not require explicit consent. I
On Monday 2 June 2008 10:05:23 Ed Murphy wrote:
> Ivan Hope wrote:
>
> > Implicit consent is not explicit consent. I judge the same thing as
> > before, which is TRUE.
>
> Rule 1742 does not require explicit consent. I intend (with 2 support)
> to appeal this case, and I recommend that the panel
I wrote:
> Rule 1742 does not require explicit consent. I intend (with 2 support)
> to appeal this case, and I recommend that the panel judge REASSIGN.
With the support of Wooble and root, I appeal CFJ 1966.
5 matches
Mail list logo
