On Jan 29, 2008 12:00 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008 9:31 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here I am attempting to use the normal english definition of the word
> > 'deregister'. Note that R869 does not define this word. It defines "to
> > deregister" and "
On Jan 29, 2008 12:00 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008 9:31 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here I am attempting to use the normal english definition of the word
> > 'deregister'. Note that R869 does not define this word. It defines "to
> > deregister" and "
On Jan 29, 2008 9:31 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here I am attempting to use the normal english definition of the word
> 'deregister'. Note that R869 does not define this word. It defines "to
> deregister" and "to be deregistered".
Nonsense. One doesn't define a form of a word in
On Jan 29, 2008 4:58 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H. parties to the Vote Market: I hereby inform you of equity case 1886
> and invite you to submit arguments regarding the equitability of the
> situation described therein.
>
My original sell tickets state:
{
Sell Ticket
Action: If all fi
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 04:58:57 Zefram wrote:
> H. parties to the Vote Market: I hereby inform you of equity case 1886
> and invite you to submit arguments regarding the equitability of the
> situation described therein.
>
> >== CFJ 1886 ===
5 matches
Mail list logo
