On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I support and do so. -G.
>
> Bah, it was so close to just passing without any voting limit increases at
> all.
I myself was watching it and thinking about a buy anyway... -G.
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 16:44 -0600, Flameshadowxeroshin wrote:
> > 6908 O 1 2.0 G Pay To Sit
> AGAINST
As comex pointed out, you sent this message to a discussion forum by
mistake; you need to send this to agora-business (or one of the other
public forums, but agora-business is t
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I support and do so. -G.
Bah, it was so close to just passing without any voting limit increases at all.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Flameshadowxeroshin
wrote:
>> 6908 O 1 2.0 G Pay To Sit
> AGAINST
NttPF.
> 6908 O 1 2.0 G Pay To Sit
AGAINST
> 6909 O 1 3.0 scshunt Carrot Juice
FOR
> 6910 O 1 3.0 omd Forgery is Forgery
AGAINST
> 6911 O 1 1.0 Murphy Fear cleanup
PRESENT
> 6912 O 0 1.0 Murphy Restore the terrible choice
AGA
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 03:51 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10-11-30 08:36 PM, omd wrote:
> > Oh, good point. I retract my previous votes on Proposals 6908-6913
> > and vote DENOUNCE WOOBLE * 2 on each. Then I vote:
>
> This still doesn't help on high-AI proposals.
>
> On each outstanding Agoran D
6 matches
Mail list logo
