The problem is, by R208 it isn't actually a proposal resolution if
it doesn't "provides a tally of the voters' valid ballots."
Note that it's a bit weird - the tally of valid ballots isn't actually
what self-ratifies - that's in R2034. So the tally is more platonic,
if it was incorrect, the res
Per rule 208, an invalid tally must invalidate the decision.
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017, 15:17 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believed it was a revision of the previously published document
> because the outcomes were not changed.
>
>
> On 10/22/2017
I believed it was a revision of the previously published document
because the outcomes were not changed.
On 10/22/2017 02:34 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I spend a shiny to CFJ "In the below-quoted message, PSS resolved an
> Agoran Decision".
>
> Arguments: See also CFJ 3576 about revisions of report
3 matches
Mail list logo
