I still plan to publish a revised judgement. (Hon. Arbitor, a tiny bit of
forebearance before you reassign it? I’ve spent this evening catching up, not
making much in the way of forward progress.) Will that do?
-o
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 5:26 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> Cou
It better be a report, or it wouldn't self ratify, which we seem to be
assuming it does.
-Aris
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Totally agree, the CoE part is an unforeseen loophole!
>
> I suppose up you could argue that the R2201 duty is to publish a "revision"
> which
Could you give insight into this?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 2:05 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 1:12 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> I find the statement
>>
>>> If V.J. Rada posted the following text conta
If you're pondering this, It might be worth pondering how deputization plays in
here.
If an Officer misses "last week's" report, but then publishes "this week's"
report, can someone else still deputize to publish "last week's " report?
If you say " no, because it's impossible to go back in ti
Totally agree, the CoE part is an unforeseen loophole!
I suppose up you could argue that the R2201 duty is to publish a "revision"
which isn't the same thing as a report?
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Just to clarify my original argument, it's my belief that duty
> fulfilling repo
I intend to at least try to establish some precedent around when, precisely, a
periodic duty such as a weekly report is “due,” and to do so in a way that
allows it to come due with sufficient time for the officer to fulfil it before
it becomes overdue and a card may be issued. We’ll see how succ
The "duty" in that rule
is to perform the "task" at least once. If you do it more times, it's still
only
the singular duty of doing the task "at least once" in the given time period.
On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I considered that, at least superficially, but note the “at least”
Just to clarify my original argument, it's my belief that duty
fulfilling report is one that fulfills an official obligation (you
could be punished for not doing that job, and now you can't). A CoE
revision fulfills the duty to handle the CoE, and it is a report,
so... Basically, I agree with the c
I considered that, at least superficially, but note the “at least” in the
definition of “weekly duties.” Even considering the common term “duty,” that
“at least” appears to make any weekly report duty-fulfilling, regardless of how
long it’s been since the previous report.
The other option I cou
The rules define official duty as "any duty..." but do not the word duty in
general.
Seems worthy of reconsideration as it misses this basic definition. The
definitition
of Duty (in dictionary) is something required to be performed, and once a shall
is satisfied, there is no requirement (ie
10 matches
Mail list logo
