On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 16:01 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > It's also the equivalent of a PF for at least two other nomics, both of
> > which are now dead.
>
> On behalf of One True Agora, I object to the Agoran Ambassador
> claiming we're dea
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> It's also the equivalent of a PF for at least two other nomics, both of
> which are now dead.
On behalf of One True Agora, I object to the Agoran Ambassador
claiming we're dead. It's only a flesh wound!
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 14:53 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > ##nomic is an Agoran discussion forum, and has no status at all in B.
> > It should work the same as a-d.
>
> ##nomic has a longer history and usage than its official status in
> Agora. In practice, people discus
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> ##nomic is an Agoran discussion forum, and has no status at all in B.
> It should work the same as a-d.
##nomic has a longer history and usage than its official status in
Agora. In practice, people discuss more nomics than just Agora there,
frequently enough to make intent
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 11:03 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 08:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> On Thu, 21 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> >>> OTOH, pledges have to be public now, so the pledge would have to be
> >>> published to take
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 08:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> OTOH, pledges have to be public now, so the pledge would have to be
>>> published to take effect anyway. Agreeing in ##nomic to a non-pledge
>>> private
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 08:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > OTOH, pledges have to be public now, so the pledge would have to be
> > published to take effect anyway. Agreeing in ##nomic to a non-pledge
> > private contract or to a public contract (with the
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> If two players agree privately to a document that includes a clause
>> "this is a public contract" (with the honest intent of publishing it
>> afterwards), do you have a private contract which lat
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> If two players agree privately to a document that includes a clause
> "this is a public contract" (with the honest intent of publishing it
> afterwards), do you have a private contract which later becomes
> public, or no contract (until it is
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> OTOH, pledges have to be public now, so the pledge would have to be
> published to take effect anyway. Agreeing in ##nomic to a non-pledge
> private contract or to a public contract (with the fact published
> later) is a different case.
If two players
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> I believe that the intent to use Agoran jurisdiction must be
> unambiguous. So, saying "I pledge to ASAP transfer a 7 Crop to you" in
> ##nomic would probably create an Agoran pledge (assuming B doesn't also
> have a version of the AAA), a
Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 19:01 -0400, Warrigal wrote (in spoon-business):
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> > CONTRACTS
>> > -
>> > (none)
>>
>> I agree to all documents as public contracts.
>
> I call for judgement on the statement "Warrigal woul
12 matches
Mail list logo
