On 8/22/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm a fan of democracy. Not that it's the best form of government,
> > but we have yet to find anything better.
> .
>
> Democracy is boring. This is a game.
>
Hear! Hear!
BobTHJ
On 8/22/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a fan of democracy. Not that it's the best form of government,
> but we have yet to find anything better.
And those who insist on continuous democracy prevent us finding anything better.
> I'd be happy to have VLOP constant, but I fear that it
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
And what reason was that, then?
Having a default officeholder makes officeholding indeterminate when
we're not sure who the default officeholder is. It spreads uncertainty
regarding the game state. We ran into this recently regarding the CotC,
when resolving C
Ed Murphy wrote:
>And what reason was that, then?
Having a default officeholder makes officeholding indeterminate when
we're not sure who the default officeholder is. It spreads uncertainty
regarding the game state. We ran into this recently regarding the CotC,
when resolving CFJ 1684a, where we
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
a) Default Officeholder.
We repealed this for a good reason.
And what reason was that, then?
b) Default Justice.
This is a better way to handle a default justice than what we had before.
Why?
c) Wielder of Veto.
Undemocratic.
S
Ed Murphy wrote:
>a) Default Officeholder.
We repealed this for a good reason.
>b) Default Justice.
This is a better way to handle a default justice than what we had before.
>c) Wielder of Veto.
Undemocratic.
I'm opposed to the whole principle of prerogative powers. (
Woot.
On 8/21/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proto-Proposal: Ministers Without Portfolio
> (AI = 3, please)
>
> Amend Rule 1922 (Defined Regular Patent Titles) by appending this text:
>
>(e) Minister Without Portfolio, to be awarded to any player
> who wins the ga
7 matches
Mail list logo
