Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Expanded foreign relations

2007-07-14 Thread Roger Hicks
On 7/14/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Back in 1996 a similar proposal was adopted, recognising Canada as a fellow nomic and instructing the Ambassador to seek diplomatic links. The rule defining the Ambassador was then repealed before the directive could be carried out. Murphy's present

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Expanded foreign relations

2007-07-14 Thread Zefram
Taral wrote: >Why? Back in 1996 a similar proposal was adopted, recognising Canada as a fellow nomic and instructing the Ambassador to seek diplomatic links. The rule defining the Ambassador was then repealed before the directive could be carried out. Murphy's present proposal is just unfinished

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Expanded foreign relations

2007-07-14 Thread Ed Murphy
Eris wrote: On 7/13/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Proto-Proposal: Expanded foreign relations Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Ambassador is ordered to seek mutual recognition between Agora Nomic and Canada. Why? Why not?

DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Expanded foreign relations

2007-07-14 Thread Taral
On 7/13/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Proto-Proposal: Expanded foreign relations Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Ambassador is ordered to seek mutual recognition between Agora Nomic and Canada. Why? -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further tr