Ed Murphy wrote:
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
"If an executee is prohibiting from performing an
action, each of its executors is prohibited from performing the
action on behalf of that executee."
That's not the sentence I have trouble with. I was talking about
Holding executorship o
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
"If an executee is prohibiting from performing an
action, each of its executors is prohibited from performing the
action on behalf of that executee."
That's not the sentence I have trouble with. I was talking about
Holding executorship of another entity d
Ed Murphy wrote:
>"If an executee is prohibiting from performing an
>action, each of its executors is prohibited from performing the
>action on behalf of that executee."
That's not the sentence I have trouble with. I was talking about
Holding executorship of another entity does not in itsel
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
I interpreted it as equivalent to "a given action".
Still not specifying which action.
Nor does it need to. Okay, here's a third re-phrasing which is
hopefully unambiguous:
(original)
"If an executee is prohibiting from performing an
action, each of its exec
Ed Murphy wrote:
>I interpreted it as equivalent to "a given action".
Still not specifying which action.
-zefram
Zefram wrote:
Michael Slone wrote:
*An* action, just as I wrote.
Any action? This is such a strange reading that I'm still not convinced
I've understood you correctly. You're placing a restriction on which
executors have the power to perform actions on behalf of their executees.
The restric
Michael Slone wrote:
>*An* action, just as I wrote.
Any action? This is such a strange reading that I'm still not convinced
I've understood you correctly. You're placing a restriction on which
executors have the power to perform actions on behalf of their executees.
The restriction is that they
On 5/9/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The power to perform what action?
*An* action, just as I wrote.
[snip some comments]
From some of your comments I get the (distinct, but perhaps incorrect)
impression that you believe that I use ``protoproposal'' as a synonym
for ``final draft''
Michael Slone wrote:
> but an executor with the power to
> perform an action
The power to perform what action?
> Executorship of an entity that is not a natural person can be
> granted or revoked by the action of a proposal with power as
> great a
On 5/9/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are proposals empowered to change executorship?
I don't know how to answer your question, but if this protoproposal
were adopted, then the two executorship-granting provisions would take
effect. See the following, which appears earlier in the proto:
On 5/9/07, Michael Slone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Grant executorship of the Pineapple Partnership to Goethe and Zefram.
Grant executorship of Human Point Two to Murphy and Quazie.
Are proposals empowered to change executorship?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"You can't prove anything."
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
