Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
The parties to the contract are all unqualified to be assigned
as judge of the case, unless the contract is the rules.
I still reckon the rules are not amenable to the use of an equity-like
process. Can you give some examples of judgements that you im
Zefram wrote:
> Common sense can only stretch so far. I find it totally inadequate to
> resolve fundamental conflicts between the unstated assumptions behind
> various rules.
Interesting. I find the opposite. Specifically, despite Agora's
reputation for formality and quibbling, I find that our
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>Or you can use a small amount of common sense,
Common sense can only stretch so far. I find it totally inadequate to
resolve fundamental conflicts between the unstated assumptions behind
various rules.
-zefram
Zefram wrote:
> You need to be clear about the role of the criminal court
> within a contract and as applied to contracts generally. You need to
> be clear about where contractual obligations are rooted.
>
> Turning the rules into a contract is a major project.
Or you can use a small amount of c
Ed Murphy wrote:
> The parties to the contract are all unqualified to be assigned
> as judge of the case, unless the contract is the rules.
I still reckon the rules are not amenable to the use of an equity-like
process. Can you give some examples of judgements that you imagine
might res
5 matches
Mail list logo
