On 1/19/2020 3:04 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 10:40, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by inserting "authorial
>> intent," after "past judgements,".
>>
>
> Qu
Alexis wrote:
> > Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by inserting "authorial
> > intent," after "past judgements,".
>
> Quite opposed; this would require judges to read mailing lists to determine
> intent.
Fair enough! Like I said, mostly there to provoke discussion. Would you
feel differen
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 10:40, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by inserting "authorial
> intent," after "past judgements,".
>
Quite opposed; this would require judges to read mailing lists to determine
int
On 1/19/20 10:39 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> and SHALL before the end
> of the next Agoran week, grant the associated set of assets to the
> player.
I don't think this is an actual requirement. According to Rule 2141, "a
rule [...] is always taking effect", which
4 matches
Mail list logo