root wrote:
On 5/25/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A player may change emself from sitting to lying down, or vice
versa, by announcement.
Why can't standing players change themselves to lying down? Seems a
bit arbitrary.
The general concept of this proposal makes it
On 5/25/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A player may change emself from sitting to lying down, or vice
versa, by announcement.
Why can't standing players change themselves to lying down? Seems a
bit arbitrary.
-root
Maud wrote:
On 5/6/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Speaker and Clerk of the Courts
are changed to standing; all other players are changed to lying down.
What is the purpose of this provision of the proposal?
Orientations need to be reinitiali
On 5/6/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Speaker and Clerk of the Courts
are changed to standing; all other players are changed to lying down.
What is the purpose of this provision of the proposal?
--
C. Maud Image (Michael Slone)
We are living in
Zefram wrote:
Proposal: The Standing Court
The question has recently been raised of whether merely quoting a
proposal in this fashion is sufficient to indicate submission of it.
You may want to disambiguate.
I still think the preponderance of the evidence says "yes", even in
the case previo
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Proposal: The Standing Court
The question has recently been raised of whether merely quoting a
proposal in this fashion is sufficient to indicate submission of it.
You may want to disambiguate.
>A player is ineligible to be Trial Judge of a CFJ if
> e was n
6 matches
Mail list logo
