comex wrote:
> On 6/18/08, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal, titled "Repeal Partnerships" (AI=2, II=0):
>
> I wouldn't support repealing partnerships altogether-- for example,
> the AFO provides a nice place for Murphy and I to store crops-- but
> there are
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:19 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about: a person can only be part of one partnership at a time,
> partnerships only become eligible to register 24 hours after they
> become public? This would make things a little more sane while
> keeping partnerships in the
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, comex wrote:
> How about: a person can only be part of one partnership at a time,
> partnerships only become eligible to register 24 hours after they
> become public? This would make things a little more sane while
> keeping partnerships in the rules.
Holy Groups!
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:19 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about: a person can only be part of one partnership at a time,
> partnerships only become eligible to register 24 hours after they
> become public? This would make things a little more sane while
> keeping partnerships in the
On 6/18/08, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, titled "Repeal Partnerships" (AI=2, II=0):
I wouldn't support repealing partnerships altogether-- for example,
the AFO provides a nice place for Murphy and I to store crops-- but
there are definitely some negatives
5 matches
Mail list logo
