On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, comex wrote:
> On Jun 24, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Oh ps., if this is part of another method for sticking this through, there's
>> an old precedent that says "reasonable time" for response when unspecified
>> is
>> a minimum of 4 days (precedent said that, giv
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 24, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh ps., if this is part of another method for sticking this through,
there's
an old precedent that says "reasonable time" for response when
unspecified is
a minimum of 4 days (precedent said that, given Agoran culture and
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, comex wrote:
> [I assume this counts as reasonably public review for the Rule Change
> of creating that rule, even if it is performed other than through the
> proposal actually passing.]
Oh ps., if this is part of another method for sticking this through, there's
an old prec
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, comex wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, entitled "R101 Safety Net" (AI=3):
> {
> Enact a new Power=3 Rule reading:
>
> comex CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement, as
> long as e published the amendment for public review at least 24
> hours
4 matches
Mail list logo
