DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: No Silly Orders

2007-01-31 Thread Ed Murphy
Grey Knight wrote: Amend Rule 1793, "Orders" by appending the following paragraph: Any Order which requires any entity to perform an impossible or illegal action, or to refrain from performing an action which that entity is either legally required to perform or which it is impossible not to

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: No Silly Orders

2007-01-31 Thread Taral
On 1/31/07, Grey Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Amend Rule 1793, "Orders" by appending the following paragraph: Any Order which requires any entity to perform an impossible or illegal action, or to refrain from performing an action which that entity is either legally required to perf

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: No Silly Orders

2007-01-31 Thread Michael Slone
On 1/31/07, Grey Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any Order which requires any entity to perform an impossible or illegal action, or to refrain from performing an action which that entity is either legally required to perform or which it is impossible not to perform, is considered an invalid

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: No Silly Orders

2007-01-31 Thread Zefram
Grey Knight wrote: >not to perform, is considered an invalid order. I would vote FOR that if it were not for the "considered" bit. This should be just plain "is invalid". -zefram