Ed Murphy wrote:
> Also, it's one more Platonic delayed-effect for the Insulator to track.
Who said it has to be Platonic? "Any player CAN create N rests in the
ninny's possession, provided that the case in question in unappealable
and that no player has already done so for that case." Or even "A
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:43, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> BobTHJ wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:15, Ed Murphy wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
> The "with N support" mechanism for NOVs is very messy. This proposes
> to replace that with a simple "with support". It also rem
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:43, Ed Murphy wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:15, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> BobTHJ wrote:
>>>
The "with N support" mechanism for NOVs is very messy. This proposes
to replace that with a simple "with support". It also removes the
>>> This would
c. wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> True, but the problem with the 5-lights scam was not the NOV
>> publication. It was the ability to publish, contest, CFJ, and sentence
>> all in the same message. The with N support 'fix' for NOV publication
>> attacked the wrong p
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:15, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> BobTHJ wrote:
>>
>>> The "with N support" mechanism for NOVs is very messy. This proposes
>>> to replace that with a simple "with support". It also removes the
>> This would allow the CotC or Justiciar to launch a successful
>> fiv
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> True, but the problem with the 5-lights scam was not the NOV
> publication. It was the ability to publish, contest, CFJ, and sentence
> all in the same message. The with N support 'fix' for NOV publication
> attacked the wrong problem.
There ar
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:15, Ed Murphy wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>
>> The "with N support" mechanism for NOVs is very messy. This proposes
>> to replace that with a simple "with support". It also removes the
>
> This would allow the CotC or Justiciar to launch a successful
> five-lights scam with ju
BobTHJ wrote:
> The "with N support" mechanism for NOVs is very messy. This proposes
> to replace that with a simple "with support". It also removes the
This would allow the CotC or Justiciar to launch a successful
five-lights scam with just one other conspirator.
8 matches
Mail list logo