Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Hand Limit Remodel

2009-08-12 Thread Roger Hicks
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:37, Pavitra wrote: > It feels like it's duplicating much of the logic of NoVs. And I don't > like the separation between creating and closing audits. > > Maybe this would be a good time to add With N (Days) Notice to R1728(a). > A person CAN, under certain secured circums

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Hand Limit Remodel

2009-08-12 Thread Pavitra
Roger Hicks wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:05, Pavitra wrote: >> Roger Hicks wrote: >>> Hand Limit Remodel >> >> I don't like it. It's messy, unweildy, and the mandadory monthly audits >> shouldn't be in there. >> > Monthly audits could be removed. What do you find to be particularly > messy o

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Hand Limit Remodel

2009-08-12 Thread comex
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Roger Hicks wrote: > Append to the list of cards in R2261 ("The Deck of Change"): > {{ > Supersize Me - Specify an entity. That entity's Hand Limit is increased by 1. > > Shrink Potion - Specify an entity. That entity's Hand Limit is decreased by 1. > }} > > Append

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Hand Limit Remodel

2009-08-12 Thread Roger Hicks
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:05, Pavitra wrote: > Roger Hicks wrote: >> Hand Limit Remodel > > I don't like it. It's messy, unweildy, and the mandadory monthly audits > shouldn't be in there. > Monthly audits could be removed. What do you find to be particularly messy or unwieldy? It's no longer than

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Hand Limit Remodel

2009-08-12 Thread Pavitra
Roger Hicks wrote: > Hand Limit Remodel I don't like it. It's messy, unweildy, and the mandadory monthly audits shouldn't be in there.