Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Dependent Actions During Lull

2009-10-19 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
>> Can't the sentence in the brackets be phrased to be a little more easy >> to understand? > > Ok. > > I retract the above proposal and submit the following one: > Thanks. -- -Tiger

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Dependent Actions During Lull

2009-10-18 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
2009/10/18 Charles Walker : > I submit the following proposal: > > {{ > > Dependent Actions During Lull (AI = 3, II = 1) > > In Rule 1728 (Dependent Actions) replace > >      A rule or contract which purports to allow a person (the >      performer) to perform an action by a set of one or more of t