Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Concerning a potential scam

2007-09-17 Thread Josiah Worcester
Thank you for pointing out the many problems in my proposals. It's great that you recorded them, but, unfortunately for you, I've already withdrawn them (thanks to some of the other bugs in it). pikhq

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Concerning a potential scam

2007-09-17 Thread Zefram
Josiah Worcester wrote: >Rule 2130 shall be amended, such that the last sentence states: If such a proposal were adopted, I (as rulekeepor) would interpret this as replacing the existing last sentence. That doesn't seem likely to be your intent, in the context of the rule text, though. Would be

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Concerning a potential scam

2007-09-16 Thread comex
On 9/16/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rule 2130 shall be amended, such that the last sentence states: This is ambiguous as to whether or not the existing last sentence is removed. > (e) Unscamster, which may be awarded to any Player who has shown great > enthusiasm, pe

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Concerning a potential scam

2007-09-16 Thread comex
On 9/16/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Upon reading the rules, I came across the discovery that any player > may make > another player inactive You missed the clause "without objection", which means that any player can object to the attempted inactivity flip within four