woggle wrote:
> This should avoid taking precedence over a higher- or lower-class crime
> defined by the rule that contains the MAY.
What would be better is a general precedence rule for actions violating
multiple rules, either to make explicit or to alter the current "only
one (of the players' c
On 4/28/09 4:01 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I retract the previous version of this proposal.
>
> Proposal: Decriminalize restricted actions
> (AI = 3, please)
>
> Amend Rule 2125 (Regulation Regulations) by replacing this text:
>
> d) The rules explicitly state that it MAY be performed while
>
Sgeo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I retract the previous version of this proposal.
>>
>> Proposal: Decriminalize restricted actions
>> (AI = 3, please)
>>
>> Amend Rule 2125 (Regulation Regulations) by replacing this text:
>>
>> d) The rules explicitly state
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I retract the previous version of this proposal.
>
> Proposal: Decriminalize restricted actions
> (AI = 3, please)
>
> Amend Rule 2125 (Regulation Regulations) by replacing this text:
>
> d) The rules explicitly state that it MAY be perform
4 matches
Mail list logo
