Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

> Section 19 is broken, in that it attempts to contradict > reality. Neither section 19 nor the issue that created it > did anything to deal directly with shares already in the > possession of non-shareholders. "Reality" is that Primo Corp shares are fictitious, and none of us own any. They're

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

> Its rounding clause doesn't apply to non-shareholders, either. > > At least it hasn't caught the "a suffusion of yellow" bug... Which one was that? I don't recall. -root Rishonomic died a horrible death when a gag proposal that wasn't intended to pass changed all numbers in its ruleset to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

On 6/20/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: root wrote: >> I disagree with both of you. The sqrt(2) shares that I transferred >> to you were created by charter-specified methods (IPO or CFO salary); >> and I didn't just offer them, I flat-out transferred them according >> to the old sectio

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

root wrote: I disagree with both of you. The sqrt(2) shares that I transferred to you were created by charter-specified methods (IPO or CFO salary); and I didn't just offer them, I flat-out transferred them according to the old section 19. Yes, I agree with you on that count, but section 19 n

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

On 6/19/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BobTHJ wrote: > My interpretation was that since there is no time-limit for accepting > shares that have been offered, the offer is still on the table. > > BobTHJ > > On 6/19/07, * Ian Kelly* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

BobTHJ wrote: My interpretation was that since there is no time-limit for accepting shares that have been offered, the offer is still on the table. BobTHJ On 6/19/07, * Ian Kelly* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: On 6/19/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

My interpretation was that since there is no time-limit for accepting shares that have been offered, the offer is still on the table. BobTHJ On 6/19/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/19/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > root and Eris have been offered shares by Murphy. A

DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

On 6/19/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: root and Eris have been offered shares by Murphy. According to the newly revised section 19 of the Primo Corporation charter, by accepting those shares (if they chose to do so) they become party to the Primo Corporation agreement. That's an int