On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:00 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
root wrote:
On 6/6/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Owning shares does not make you a Shareholder, and does not make
you party
to the agreement. Only Shareholders can vote.
So, root and Eris are permitted to own the shares, but they d
On 6/6/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I write "Kallisti" on the back of 1 Share of Primo Corporation,
then transfer it to Eris.
I attempt to eat 1 Share of Primo Corporation, but it doesn't taste
very good. Whatever happened to using apples?
--
Eris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me
On 6/7/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
root has violated the agreement titled "Primo Corporation Charter"
If I understand correctly, root is not bound by the agreement, so it's
impossible for em to violate it.
I bar root from this CFJ.
The defendant is automatically barred, unl
BobTHJ wrote:
Just to attack this from another angle, I call for civil judgment (per
R1742) on the following statement:
root has violated the agreement titled "Primo Corporation Charter"
I submit as evidence the Primo Corporation Charter (found at
http://groups.google.com/group/primo-corpora
Owning shares does not make you a Shareholder, and does not make you party
to the agreement. Only Shareholders can vote.
So, root and Eris are permitted to own the shares, but they do them no good
unless they somehow become a party to the Primo Corp agreement.
BobTHJ
On 6/6/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAI
BobTHJ wrote:
Hey, you're the CFO. You're the one that has to keep track of it :)
More to the point, there are now two players who possess Shares
without having agreed to the Primo charter. Thoughts?
Hey, you're the CFO. You're the one that has to keep track of it :)
BobTHJ
On 6/6/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I write "Kallisti" on the back of 1 Share of Primo Corporation,
then transfer it to Eris.
I transfer sqrt(2) Shares of Primo Corporation to root.
7 matches
Mail list logo
