On Jan 17, 2008 8:21 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A properly written pledge could probably prevent the joining, though to be a
> contract, it would need to have had 2 parties at some point.
A person intent on abusing the loophole presumably wouldn't write it
that way in the first
On Friday 18 January 2008 02:46:23 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2008 7:14 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Obtaining agreement requires that two people be involved, but "all
> > parties" is just one person in such a case.
>
> The precedent in CFJs 1682 and 1683 suggests that this i
On Jan 17, 2008 7:14 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Obtaining agreement requires that two people be involved, but "all parties"
> is just one person in such a case.
The precedent in CFJs 1682 and 1683 suggests that this is probably correct.
> Clearly, it would against the intentio
3 matches
Mail list logo
