4st wrote:
I couldn't find these three players (so far, maybe I can't find more):
Douglas Hofstadter, General Chaos, Troublemaker At Large
and Ørjan is listed differently.
General Chaos, Kelly (1996), and Kelly (1997-1999) are a single person.
Ørjan / Oerjan (1995, 1996, 1996-2000) are a sing
On 11/9/23 21:09, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> These are based on the email used to register according to the registrar's
> report.
> My plan here is to omit them entirely from the dataset, since they are most
> definitely bad data.
> If I can find evidence on whether or not they are the s
On 11/9/23 19:16, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> Here are my stats so far:
> number of reported players: 382
> number of probably-not-a-person: 59
> number of estimated players, (reduced by probably-the-same-person and
> probably-not-a-person): 300
>
> I'm reporting things early on in this
Welcome back!
On Sat, 23 Sep 2017 at 20:42, Jack Henahan wrote:
> According to the Registrar's report, I was deregistered at some point. I
> hereby reregister myself as a player, or register as a new player in the
> event that "reregistration" is ILLEGAL or IMPOSSIBLE.
>
ProofTechnique. I have added a signature to aid future searches.
---
ProofTechnique
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 15:05, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> What is your nickname?
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>> On Sep 23, 2017, at 2:
What is your nickname?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Jack Henahan wrote:
>
> According to the Registrar's report, I was deregistered at some point. I
> hereby reregister myself as a player, or register as a new player i
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> I intend to become a player at this time.
As far as I can tell you are already a player, but an inactive one.
So you need to say "I make myself active" or the like.
-G.
on top of that you add in a visual impairment that really messes with my
head when things get wordy so again simple clarifications help a great deal
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Max Schutz
> wrote:
> > i attempted as i thought the in
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Max Schutz wrote:
> i attempted as i thought the inactivation had already gone through which is
> a common mistake to make with autism as is a need for varification on some
> things which to someone else would not seem as complex
All right, that makes sense.
—Ma
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Max Schutz wrote:
> i will go active under the understanding that if clarification is needed it
> will be given
A few hours ago, you attempted to become active despite already being
active, and so your prior attempt was ineffective. Now you have
attempted to becom
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Max Schutz wrote:
> ok so how would i become active again
You can become inactive by announcing "I become inactive", and you
become active by announcing "I become active".
—Machiavelli
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 00:59 -0400, Max Schutz wrote:
> I object to making me inactive on the grounds that I have been busy with
> work and dealing with some personal stuff
This is exactly the sort of circumstance that being inactive is meant
for.
I rarely deregister, but I become inactive due to
12 matches
Mail list logo
