On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ais523 can't return the point, so an equitable resolution would be to
> award each other party 1 free point as well. ;-)
No.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I agree that criminal proceedings aren't reasonable, I'm more thinking of
>> the equity; what is an "equitable" solution to making a mistake that
>> resets all other members' poin
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 14:24 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 14:07 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > As is, I don't think there's a lot that can be done. The PRS was acting
> > not-in-accordance-with-expectations due to a mistake, so that can
On 27 Oct 2008, at 21:24, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I agree that criminal proceedings aren't reasonable, I'm more
thinking of
the equity; what is an "equitable" solution to making a mistake that
resets all other members' points? I'm not too bothered with
"gamestate
changing" issues, equity is mo
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I agree that criminal proceedings aren't reasonable, I'm more thinking of
> the equity; what is an "equitable" solution to making a mistake that
> resets all other members' points?
ps. Maybe equity would be me putting a big word ILLEGAL next to the w
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 14:07 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> As is, I don't think there's a lot that can be done. The PRS was acting
> not-in-accordance-with-expectations due to a mistake, so that can be
> solved equitably, but the gamestate will have changed a
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 14:07 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
> >> to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 15:07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
>>> to clearly label it as one. ais523
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
>> to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of at least 100.
>>
>> Therefore, by rule 2187, I satisfy the W
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
> to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of at least 100.
>
> Therefore, by rule 2187, I satisfy the Winning Condition of High Score;
> I do not sati
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I initiate an equity case regarding the PRS, whose parties are ehird,
> BobTHJ, comex, Murphy, Quazie, Wooble, Pavitra, ais523, and root.
> ais523 should only have gotten 1 point from the above cashout since e
> only had 1 PV
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
> to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of at least 100.
>
> Therefore, by rule 2187, I satisfy the Winning Condition of High Score;
> I do not satisfy any Losing Conditions, th
12 matches
Mail list logo
