ehird wrote:
> 2009/6/29 Sean Hunt :
>> I object. Activity is needed because, in the case of non-embassy
>
> But what about
Fnord!
2009/6/29 Sean Hunt :
> I object. Activity is needed because, in the case of non-embassy
But what about
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>> Alex Smith wrote:
>>> That's an interesting question: how do we know e isn't an Agoran player?
>>> Nothing forces anyone to sign up to PerlNomic with the same username
>>> and/or email as to Agora, after all.
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Alex Smith wrote:
>> That's an interesting question: how do we know e isn't an Agoran player?
>> Nothing forces anyone to sign up to PerlNomic with the same username
>> and/or email as to Agora, after all.
>>
> I think we just have to assume in the abs
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 14:28 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> I think we just have to assume in the absence of evidence to the
> contrary. Are there old CFJ decisions that would have to be overturned
> if it turned out that Hillary Rodham Clinton was a player?
I doubt it, those were judged SLIPPERY f
Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 11:51 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> >> I deregister the PNP.
>> >
>> > Fails; the PNP is a person.
>> >
>>
>> Err, nevermind, Ranier isn't
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 11:51 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> >> I deregister the PNP.
> >
> > Fails; the PNP is a person.
> >
>
> Err, nevermind, Ranier isn't a player.
That's an interes
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I deregister the PNP.
>
> Fails; the PNP is a person.
>
Err, nevermind, Ranier isn't a player.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I deregister the PNP.
Fails; the PNP is a person.
On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 14:06 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I intend without objection to make the PerlNomic Partnership inactive;
> the server seems to be gone.
I object; does anyone have a recent tarball? The PNP contract allows for
the situation in which the existing PerlNomic server dies.
--
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> This is going to irritate somebody, I'm sure.
>
> I deregister the PNP.
In case I wasn't the only one to misunderstand: this is for
insufficient parties, not a supposed inability to communicate in
English.
--
-c.
11 matches
Mail list logo
