Well, it's all in the same category, so it's not a huge burden to
write (x500) in the report.
But yes, there have been some "technically infinite" wins in the past
I think - this isn't the first time a winning condition failed to reset
itself.
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2
Sorry if that breached a norm of the game; I just thought it was a
potentially fun scam to run.
I thought I saw that repeat awards of victories in the Herald’s report were
denoted “(x2)” or “(x3)”, etc., so didn’t think it would bloat the report.
If Herald report bloat is a concern, we can put tog
On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 19:59 -0400, D Margaux wrote:
> And one more at the deadline to try to get the last word on the RR
> victories.. :-)
>
> 500. I win by Round Robin.
>
> As I read the rule, there’s no limit to the number of times an
> eligible player can declare victory during the Effective
thanks :P
I guess I better start thinking of something to do... I mean, it doesn't
have to be a good proposal, it just has to meet the criteria of silliness :P
On 3/11/2018 4:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
(I *think* we fixed this...?)
I designate ATMunn to be next week's[1] Silly Person.
Welc
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > That's worth a test, but I think the cleanup procedure is still as
> > specified by an instrument of power-1. Haven't we similarly tested
> > that dependent actions occur at the power of each specifically
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> That's worth a test, but I think the cleanup procedure is still as
> specified by an instrument of power-1. Haven't we similarly tested
> that dependent actions occur at the power of each specifically defined
> dependent action, and not at the
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, omd wrote:
> >> This escalator is really boring because it's been used repeatedly and
> >> I've already won. However, it may be necessary if I can't get the
> >> switch thing to work
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, omd wrote:
>> This escalator is really boring because it's been used repeatedly and
>> I've already won. However, it may be necessary if I can't get the
>> switch thing to work.
>>
>> Accordingly, I intend, With Noti
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, omd wrote:
> This escalator is really boring because it's been used repeatedly and
> I've already won. However, it may be necessary if I can't get the
> switch thing to work.
>
> Accordingly, I intend, With Notice, to cause Rule 2324 to amend Rule
> 2223 by appending the t
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:23, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I leave C# Party (revised version). (Disclaimer: This only works if
> at least one of ais523's scam attempts has triggered its "any party to
> the contract can leave it" clause, which was designed to give Quazie
> the same sort of amendment-with-
10 matches
Mail list logo
