Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Of potatoes and boats

2013-04-09 Thread Tanner Swett
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > What's more of a challenge is coming up with a proposal that can > nix any jump (e.g. "replace any occurrence of scshunt in the > ruleset with...") while not violating R105's "any unambiguity" > clause, but then maybe e'd change eir nickname (an

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Of potatoes and boats

2013-04-09 Thread woggle
On 4/9/13 10:04 , Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Tanner Swett wrote: >> I submit a proposal with AI 3, titled "This suddenly isn't fun any >> more": Repeal Rule 2380. > > Ah, come on. scshunt can just create a new rule (jump this text). > It also looks like renumbering a rule can

DIS: Re: BUS: Of potatoes and boats

2013-04-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Tanner Swett wrote: > I submit a proposal with AI 3, titled "This suddenly isn't fun any > more": Repeal Rule 2380. Ah, come on. scshunt can just create a new rule (jump this text). It also looks like renumbering a rule can be done (can't find a prohibition against that). P