On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/7/08, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For all X, X is an entity. It's the noun corresponding to the
>> predicate T. At least, I think that's what "entity" is being used to
>> mean.
>
> Yes, but the rules talk about "crea
On 6/7/08, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For all X, X is an entity. It's the noun corresponding to the
> predicate T. At least, I think that's what "entity" is being used to
> mean.
Yes, but the rules talk about "creating" and "destroying" entities.
Those verbs aren't defined for all X.
--
On 6/6/08, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. {0,1} is an oddball.
> 2. If {a,c} is an oddball and b is the rational number between a and c
> with the lowest denominator, {a,b} and {b,c} are oddballs.
> 3. Nothing is an oddball unless the above conditions require it.
> 4. Oddballs are asset
Ivan Hope wrote:
> e asked for it!
>
> For all integers n from 1 to A(G_64,G_64), I award the oddball {0,1/n} to
> ehird.
For any non-math-geeks in the audience,
http://godplaysdice.blogspot.com/2007/09/xkcd-number.html
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:34 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Obviously, there are infinitely many oddballs, and since they would
> otherwise lack an owner, they are all owned by the Lost and Found
> Department. The definition given above prohibits oddballs from being
> created or destroyed.
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
