On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:31, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Unless you can give me a reasonable argument for this to be accepted
>> I'm treating it as
>> ineffective for not being clearly specified enough because if I allow
>> unrestricted
>> conditionals that would allow people to condit
ehird wrote:
> On 6 Nov 2008, at 17:01, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> For the purpose of this message, to flip a Credit is to perform
>> the following actions if and only if it would result in a net
>> increase in my Coin holdings:
>>
>> 1) RBoA-withdraw a Credit of that pitch
>> 2) PBA-deposit that
On 6 Nov 2008, at 18:14, Taral wrote:
Did you?
Y- no.
--
ehird
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shoulda used Prolog.
Did you?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On 6 Nov 2008, at 17:09, Elliott Hird wrote:
Unless you can give me a reasonable argument for this to be
accepted I'm treating it as
ineffective for not being clearly specified enough because if I
allow unrestricted
conditionals that would allow people to condition on turing
complete or und
On 6 Nov 2008, at 17:18, Roger Hicks wrote:
I'm in agreement. This is a pain to work out from an automation
perspective.
Shoulda used Prolog.
--
ehird
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:09, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6 Nov 2008, at 17:01, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> For the purpose of this message, to flip a Credit is to perform
>> the following actions if and only if it would result in a net
>> increase in my Coin holdings:
>>
>> 1) RBoA-wit
On 6 Nov 2008, at 17:01, Ed Murphy wrote:
For the purpose of this message, to flip a Credit is to perform
the following actions if and only if it would result in a net
increase in my Coin holdings:
1) RBoA-withdraw a Credit of that pitch
2) PBA-deposit that Credit
3) RBoA-deposit the mini
8 matches
Mail list logo
