DIS: Re: BUS: NoV, obnoxious intents

2009-04-26 Thread Alex Smith
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 19:42 -0400, comex wrote: > I take the obvious action. /me looks for an excuse to claim that the obvious action there was to join the Small Partial Mousetrap... -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoV, obnoxious intents

2009-04-21 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 01:42 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >> (I'm not sure about how weeks are counted: it's a new calendar week >> since I last published an NoV, but it hasn't been 7 days) > > The rule is that officers must publish a high-prior

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoV, obnoxious intents

2009-04-21 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:12 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 01:42 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > >> (I'm not sure about how weeks are counted: it's a new calendar week > >> since I last published an NoV, but it hasn't bee

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoV, obnoxious intents

2009-04-21 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 01:42 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > (I'm not sure about how weeks are counted: it's a new calendar week > since I last published an NoV, but it hasn't been 7 days) The rule is that officers must publish a high-priority report at least once in each week. So publishing Monday

DIS: Re: BUS: NoV, obnoxious intents

2009-04-20 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
2009/4/20 comex : > [Completely off-topic: It's a week since vacation but I'm still trying > to find the time to publish a Lead Sheet.  (hours, most likely...) > But if someone else wants to do it, I'll accept the rests for the last > few weeks.] > I'm trying to sort it out now. If you don't hear f

DIS: Re: BUS: NoV, obnoxious intents

2009-04-19 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:57 PM, comex wrote: >>> As has been noted, these NoVs are all incorrect. I would be surprised >>> if Wooble didn't know this. Therefore, >>> >>> I publish a NoV accusing Wooble of violating R2230

DIS: Re: BUS: NoV, obnoxious intents

2009-04-19 Thread Aaron Goldfein
Each of these is incorrect. Rule 1789 states that The Registrar shall note the method of deregistration for that Player in subsequent Registrar Reports, as long as the Player remains deregistered. However, while Andre did deregister in a Writ of FAGE on 13 February 1999, he registered on 18 Augus

DIS: Re: BUS: NoV, obnoxious intents

2009-04-19 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
I support all of these. 2009/4/20 Geoffrey Spear : > Bring back the history, dammit. > > I publish an NoV accusing Yally of violating > R1789, a Power-2 rule, by publishing a Registrar's Report > that failed to ensure that all know that Andre deregistered > in a Writ of FAGE. > > I intend, with 1 S

DIS: Re: BUS: NoV, obnoxious intents

2009-04-19 Thread Alex Smith
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 18:00 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I intend, with 100 Support Classic. -- ais523