Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-14 Thread Alexis Hunt
Will do. On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 9:03 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Sun, 13 Nov 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > H. Dictator Alexis (and anyone else), I intend to annotate such changes > to > > the ruleset as follows: > > > > Amended(N) by Decree (Alexis), dd Month > > > > Decrees would not

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote: > H. Dictator Alexis (and anyone else), I intend to annotate such changes to > the ruleset as follows: > > Amended(N) by Decree (Alexis), dd Month > > Decrees would not be numbered. Let me know if this sounds suitable. Also, for future sanity, it

DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:48 PM Alexis Hunt wrote: > I withdraw the quoted intent and intend, with notice, to proclaim the > following Decree: > > {{{ > Amend Rule 683 by deleting the last two bullets and then appending the > following: > > > I

DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-10 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 2:29 AM Alexis Hunt wrote: On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 3:30 AM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: I intend, with notice, to proclaim the following Decree: "Alexis and ais523 win the game." I do so. I intend, with notice, to proclaim the following De

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Owen Jacobson
On Nov 6, 2016, at 5:57 AM, Luis Ressel wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 02:57:43 -0500 > Owen Jacobson wrote: > >>> I CFJ, barring Aris "If Proposal 7821 were resolved right now, the >>> outcome would be ADOPTED.” >> >> If. >> >> It might be premature to declare victory, since proposal 7821 is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:16 PM ais523 wrote: > On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 12:09 -0600, Nicholas Evans wrote: > > Is there a relevant CFJ that suggests '7 days' equals 168 hours, > > instead of 7 calendar days? > Not sure about a CFJ, but it's been game custom for at least years, and > probably decades

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread ais523
On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 12:09 -0600, Nicholas Evans wrote: > Is there a relevant CFJ that suggests '7 days' equals 168 hours, > instead of 7 calendar days? Not sure about a CFJ, but it's been game custom for at least years, and probably decades. The relevant rule is 1023b, which states that definiti

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Nicholas Evans
Is there a relevant CFJ that suggests '7 days' equals 168 hours, instead of 7 calendar days?

DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 2:29 AM Alexis Hunt wrote: > I intend, with notice, to proclaim the following Decree: > {{{ > Amend Rule 683 by deleting the last two bullets and then appending the > following: > (e) The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision. > > A valid ballot

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016, 10:53 nichdel wrote: > On 11/06/2016 04:57 AM, Luis Ressel wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 02:57:43 -0500 > > Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > >>> I CFJ, barring Aris "If Proposal 7821 were resolved right now, the > >>> outcome would be ADOPTED.” > >> If. > >> > >> It might be prema

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread nichdel
On 11/06/2016 04:57 AM, Luis Ressel wrote: On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 02:57:43 -0500 Owen Jacobson wrote: I CFJ, barring Aris "If Proposal 7821 were resolved right now, the outcome would be ADOPTED.” If. It might be premature to declare victory, since proposal 7821 is NOT yet resolved, and the rules

DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Luis Ressel
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016 07:28:47 + Alexis Hunt wrote: > I intend, with notice, to proclaim the following Decree: > {{{ > Amend Rule 683 by deleting the last two bullets and then appending the > following: > (e) The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision. > > A valid ba

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Luis Ressel
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 02:57:43 -0500 Owen Jacobson wrote: > > I CFJ, barring Aris "If Proposal 7821 were resolved right now, the > > outcome would be ADOPTED.” > > If. > > It might be premature to declare victory, since proposal 7821 is NOT > yet resolved, and the rules set out in This One’s A S

DIS: Re: BUS: New Management

2016-11-06 Thread Owen Jacobson
On Nov 6, 2016, at 2:28 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 3:30 AM Aris Merchant > > wrote: > > 7821* Alexis 3.0 This One's A Scam > > I cast a ballot of FOR on the Agoran decision on whether or not to adopt > Proposal 7821.