Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Namery

2008-10-06 Thread Ian Kelly
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, ehird wrote: >> On 5 Oct 2008, at 14:41, Benjamin Schultz wrote: >>> That's odd... which rule is saying that an AI=3 proposal can affect a P=4 >>> rule? >> >> Rule 2140/0 (Power=3) >> Power Controls Muta

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Namery

2008-10-06 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, ehird wrote: > On 5 Oct 2008, at 14:41, Benjamin Schultz wrote: >> That's odd... which rule is saying that an AI=3 proposal can affect a P=4 >> rule? > > Rule 2140/0 (Power=3) > Power Controls Mutability > > is power 3. Thus AI=3 proposals are ominipotent. That means, in orde

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Namery

2008-10-05 Thread ehird
On 5 Oct 2008, at 14:41, Benjamin Schultz wrote: That's odd... which rule is saying that an AI=3 proposal can affect a P=4 rule? - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr -- Rule 2140/0 (Power=3) Power Controls Mutability

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Namery

2008-10-05 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Oct 5, 2008, at 9:37 AM, ehird wrote: On 5 Oct 2008, at 14:28, Benjamin Schultz wrote: On Oct 5, 2008, at 9:15 AM, ehird wrote: Proposal: Let's Get Our Names Right, Shall We? (AI=3) As the rule indicates, it is power 4. An AI=3 proposal shouldn't affect it, unless someone snuck somet

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Namery

2008-10-05 Thread ehird
On 5 Oct 2008, at 14:28, Benjamin Schultz wrote: On Oct 5, 2008, at 9:15 AM, ehird wrote: Proposal: Let's Get Our Names Right, Shall We? (AI=3) As the rule indicates, it is power 4. An AI=3 proposal shouldn't affect it, unless someone snuck something in. Last I checked AI=3 proposals we

DIS: Re: BUS: Namery

2008-10-05 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Oct 5, 2008, at 9:15 AM, ehird wrote: Proposal: Let's Get Our Names Right, Shall We? (AI=3) As the rule indicates, it is power 4. An AI=3 proposal shouldn't affect it, unless someone snuck something in. And the phrase Hail Eris! is independent of Taral's current nickname. I think.