On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> President c., when do you plan to resolve this motion?
> Sometime within one week of the close, I presume, which is eir window.
As Walker probably guessed, I completely forgot about it.
--
-c.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I initiate a Motion To Effect, specifying the following Rate List:
>>
>> Distrib-u-Matic: 55
>>
>> The eligible voters for this Motion are the parties to this contract, the
>> voting per
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I initiate a Motion To Effect, specifying the following Rate List:
>
> Distrib-u-Matic: 55
>
> The eligible voters for this Motion are the parties to this contract, the
> voting period lasts for 72 hours, and the President is the Vote Collector.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I think Pavitra means that since this rate list includes only
> Distrub-u-Matic and makes no reference to leaving other rates
> unchanged it will NULL all other rates.
Oh. It won't do that per the IBA contract:
A Rate List is a list of asset
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 17:25, comex wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> I initiate a Motion To Effect, specifying the following Rate List:
>>>
>>> Distrib-u-Matic: 55
>>
>> I vote AGAINST. I think this would stomp all other rates, making
>> Distrib-u-
2009/10/11 Sean Hunt :
> I initiate a Motion To Effect, specifying the following Rate List:
>
> Distrib-u-Matic: 55
>
> The eligible voters for this Motion are the parties to this contract, the
> voting period lasts for 72 hours, and the President is the Vote Collector.
> The possible options are F
6 matches
Mail list logo
