On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> No, that's everything. I seem to have been dealt only one of the above
>> draws, though.
>>
> Here's the records that correspond to those earned draws:
>
> Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:25 - C-Walker is dealt the following card from the
> deck of Justice
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 07:51, C-walker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:08, C-walker
>> wrote:
>>> I believe I am owed two more Justice cards, one for the case which was
>>> recently remanded to woggle, and one for the inquiry case which I
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:08, C-walker
> wrote:
>> I believe I am owed two more Justice cards, one for the case which was
>> recently remanded to woggle, and one for the inquiry case which I just
>> judged.
>>
> Appeal cases don't generate dra
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:08, C-walker wrote:
> I believe I am owed two more Justice cards, one for the case which was
> recently remanded to woggle, and one for the inquiry case which I just
> judged.
>
Appeal cases don't generate draws. Here's the DoJ draws I show you
having earned recently:
Sa
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> These didn't come through on the automated e-mail (though they did
> give me a good clue as to where to look for this weird e-mail bug). If
> I have not already I perform the actions indicated by the following
> log entries:
>
> Sun, 16 Aug 20
5 matches
Mail list logo
